Subscribe free

Appendix, Gallbladder and Surgical Emergencies ·

Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Approaches for Peptic Ulcer Perforation

This study scrutinizes laparoscopic versus open surgery for peptic ulcer perforation (PUP). Analyzing 29 studies (17,228 patients), laparoscopy emerges as a superior choice. Laparoscopic intervention correlates with shorter hospital stays, reduced blood loss, and fewer complications. Remarkably, laparoscopy also exhibits a lower mortality rate. However, it’s not without its complexities, showing a higher overall complication rate. In the realm of PUP repair, this study asserts laparoscopy as a commendable option, offering advantages, albeit with some nuances.

Journal Article by Li ZW, Tong Y (…) Peng D et 7 al. in Langenbecks Arch Surg

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

read the whole article in Langenbecks Arch Surg

open it in PubMed

Summaries are written to help you decide what to read. They do not replace the full paper.

Free · 5 minutes a day

Get every new paper in Appendix, Gallbladder and Surgical Emergencies.

Plus the Daily Selection: the five most relevant papers of the day, each cut to its key points.

Specialty newsletters: every new paper in your field, as a list of titles linked to the source. Daily Selection: the five that matter, cut to their key points.

FreeNo spamOne-click unsubscribe

More in Appendix, Gallbladder and Surgical Emergencies

The latest stitches

All papers in Appendix, Gallbladder and Surgical Emergencies →