Subscribe free

HPB & Spleen ·

Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery Outperforms Open Surgery in Surgical Outcomes

Minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) demonstrated superior outcomes compared to open surgery in a study of 260 patients. MILR, performed in 68% of cases, resulted in shorter operative times, less blood loss, lower rates of major complications and bile leaks, and reduced hospital stays. Despite a higher proportion of prior abdominal surgeries in the open surgery group, outcomes such as tumor size and liver pathology were comparable. The findings highlight the necessity of including laparoscopic or robotic surgery in the standard practice for liver resections to achieve optimal patient outcomes.

Journal Article by Yu YD, Halazun KJ, Chandwani R and Samstein B in J Minim Access Surg

Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery.

read the whole article in J Minim Access Surg

open it in PubMed

Summaries are written to help you decide what to read. They do not replace the full paper.

Free · 5 minutes a day

Get every new paper in HPB & Spleen.

Plus the Daily Selection: the five most relevant papers of the day, each cut to its key points.

Specialty newsletters: every new paper in your field, as a list of titles linked to the source. Daily Selection: the five that matter, cut to their key points.

FreeNo spamOne-click unsubscribe

More in HPB & Spleen

The latest stitches

Surg Endosc6 Nov 2026

A new cut for robotic liver surgery

A close-to-open cutting method was used for robotic liver resection, with no bile leaks and shorter hospital stays than after laparoscopy.

All papers in HPB & Spleen →