Subscribe free

Perspectives, Opinions and Curiosities ·

Simulation assessment effectively distinguishes surgical trainee competence levels

A novel simulation-based assessment of operative competence was developed, demonstrating high inter-station reliability (α = 0.81) and acceptable inter-rater reliability (0.77). Significant differences emerged in mean scores between junior and senior trainees (44.82 vs 58.18, p = 0.004), with mean scores moderately correlating with training years (rs = 0.74, p = 0.004). The assessment resulted in all senior trainees passing, while 4 out of 6 junior trainees failed, validating the assessment’s efficacy.

• Why it matters: Reliable assessments improve surgical training outcomes and trainee safety.

Journal Article by Toale C, Morris M (…) Kavanagh D et 3 al. in Surg Endosc

© 2024. The Author(s).

read the whole article in Surg Endosc

open it in PubMed

Summaries are written to help you decide what to read. They do not replace the full paper.

Free · 5 minutes a day

Get every new paper in Perspectives, Opinions and Curiosities.

Plus the Daily Selection: the five most relevant papers of the day, each cut to its key points.

Specialty newsletters: every new paper in your field, as a list of titles linked to the source. Daily Selection: the five that matter, cut to their key points.

FreeNo spamOne-click unsubscribe

More in Perspectives, Opinions and Curiosities

The latest stitches

All papers in Perspectives, Opinions and Curiosities →