Conversion Risks in Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery

Converting minimally invasive liver surgery may significantly impact patient outcomes based on urgency and approach.

Among 10,548 cases, 6.8% required conversion, with emergency conversions linked to increased blood loss, transfusions, and severe morbidity.
Elective conversions showed a safer profile, while robotic conversion had a concerning 7.7% mortality rate.

Understanding these factors is vital for surgical decision-making and patient selection.

Risk factors include bilobar disease for robotic conversions and cirrhosis or prior liver surgery for laparoscopic conversions.

Journal Article by Pilz da Cunha G, Aghayan D (…) Swijnenburg RJ et 56 al. in Ann Surg Oncol

read the whole article in Ann Surg Oncol

open it in PubMed

Summaries are written to help you decide what to read. They do not replace the full paper.

Free · 5 minutes a day

Get every new paper in HPB & Spleen.

Plus the Daily Selection: the five most relevant papers of the day, each cut to its key points.

The latest stitches

Surg Endosc6 Nov 2026

A new cut for robotic liver surgery

A close-to-open cutting method was used for robotic liver resection, with no bile leaks and shorter hospital stays than after laparoscopy.

Surg Endosc6 Nov 2026

Robotic liver resection with short-pitch dividing shortens hospital stay

Robotic liver resection using a close-to-open forceps technique was associated with no bile leakage and a shorter hospital stay than laparoscopic resection, even though more complex resections were performed in the robotic group.

Surg Endosc6 Nov 2026

Robotic bile duct stone surgery: fewer complications

Removing large common bile duct stones with a robot rather than laparoscopically was linked to fewer complications and shorter hospital stays, at a higher cost, in a study from one Chinese hospital.

All papers in HPB & Spleen →