Subscribe free

Perspectives, Opinions and Curiosities ·

Quality Assessment of Meta-Analyses on the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist

Meta-analyses show that the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist is associated with lower complication and mortality rates. However, the studies in these analyses were mostly observational, with potential biases, leading to critically low overall confidence in the results. Using the AMSTAR 2 assessment tool, the systematic review highlighted the limitations in statistical methods and publication bias. Continued evaluation of the WHO checklist is essential to ensure patient safety and the validity of these results.

Journal Article by González Mariño MA in Ann Med Surg (Lond)

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

read the whole article in Ann Med Surg (Lond)

open it in PubMed

Summaries are written to help you decide what to read. They do not replace the full paper.

Free · 5 minutes a day

Get every new paper in Perspectives, Opinions and Curiosities.

Plus the Daily Selection: the five most relevant papers of the day, each cut to its key points.

Specialty newsletters: every new paper in your field, as a list of titles linked to the source. Daily Selection: the five that matter, cut to their key points.

FreeNo spamOne-click unsubscribe

More in Perspectives, Opinions and Curiosities

The latest stitches

Perspectives, Opinions and Curiosities6 Nov 2026

Cancer Surgery Research Needs Global Action

Cancer surgery research is harder to run in low-resource settings, and a second Lancet Oncology Commission lays out how to change that.

All papers in Perspectives, Opinions and Curiosities →