Subscribe free

HPB & Spleen ·

On-demand necrosectomy holds up in pancreatic necrosis

After EUS-guided drainage for infected necrotizing pancreatitis, immediate necrosectomy showed no clear clinical advantage over waiting to intervene as needed—and may expose more patients to the procedure.

  • Across 4 randomized trials (215 patients), clinical success was similar (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.98–1.40); hospital stay, costs, complications, and mortality also did not differ significantly.
  • Immediate treatment increased the proportion undergoing necrosectomy (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.13–2.41).

The evidence is low to very low certainty, so this supports an on-demand option—not a definitive change in practice.

Review by Al Hayek M, Sawaf B (…) Al-Haddad M et 5 al. in Surg Endosc

© 2026. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

read the whole article in Surg Endosc

open it in PubMed

Summaries are written to help you decide what to read. They do not replace the full paper.

Free · 5 minutes a day

Get every new paper in HPB & Spleen.

Plus the Daily Selection: the five most relevant papers of the day, each cut to its key points.

Specialty newsletters: every new paper in your field, as a list of titles linked to the source. Daily Selection: the five that matter, cut to their key points.

FreeNo spamOne-click unsubscribe

More in HPB & Spleen

The latest stitches

All papers in HPB & Spleen →