Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Approaches for Peptic Ulcer Perforation

This study scrutinizes laparoscopic versus open surgery for peptic ulcer perforation (PUP). Analyzing 29 studies (17,228 patients), laparoscopy emerges as a superior choice. Laparoscopic intervention correlates with shorter hospital stays, reduced blood loss, and fewer complications. Remarkably, laparoscopy also exhibits a lower mortality rate. However, it’s not without its complexities, showing a higher overall complication rate. In the realm of PUP repair, this study asserts laparoscopy as a commendable option, offering advantages, albeit with some nuances.

Journal Article by Li ZW, Tong Y (…) Peng D et 7 al. in Langenbecks Arch Surg

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

read the whole article in Langenbecks Arch Surg

open it in PubMed