Subscribe free

HPB & Spleen ·

Robotic Crush and Clip Technique Reduces Complications in Pancreatectomy

The crush and clip technique for pancreatic transection in robotic distal pancreatectomy shows promise for reducing complications.

  • Postoperative pancreatic fistula rates were 13% for crush and clip vs. 26% for stapler (p=0.280).
  • Significant advantage in thick pancreas cases: 6% vs. 47% for crush and clip vs. stapler (p=0.013).

This technique eliminates major complications, with none seen in crush and clip cases compared to 14% in stapler cases.

  • The cc technique offers a practical alternative that could enhance patient safety without increasing costs.

Journal Article by Uchida Y, Takahara T (…) Suda K et 7 al. in Surg Endosc

© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

read the whole article in Surg Endosc

open it in PubMed

Summaries are written to help you decide what to read. They do not replace the full paper.

Free · 5 minutes a day

Get every new paper in HPB & Spleen.

Plus the Daily Selection: the five most relevant papers of the day, each cut to its key points.

Specialty newsletters: every new paper in your field, as a list of titles linked to the source. Daily Selection: the five that matter, cut to their key points.

FreeNo spamOne-click unsubscribe

More in HPB & Spleen

The latest stitches

All papers in HPB & Spleen →