Subscribe free

Surgical Endoscopy ·

Low inter-rater reliability and variability in assessing laparoscopic fundoplication with endoscopy

This study evaluated the inter-rater reliability and variability in assessing laparoscopic fundoplication using endoscopy. A total of 101 participants, including upper gastrointestinal surgeons and gastroenterologists, analyzed ten static endoscopic images post-fundoplication. The study found that overall accuracy was 76% for upper gastrointestinal surgeons and 69.9% for gastroenterologists. Upper gastrointestinal surgeons performed significantly better in certain cases, particularly in describing the integrity of the fundoplication. The study highlights the need for a standardized reporting system to improve consistency and reliability in assessing post-fundoplication patients.

Journal Article by Fantasia JJ, Cock C (…) Thompson SK et 2 al. in Surg Endosc

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

read the whole article in Surg Endosc

open it in PubMed

Summaries are written to help you decide what to read. They do not replace the full paper.

Free · 5 minutes a day

Get every new paper in Surgical Endoscopy.

Plus the Daily Selection: the five most relevant papers of the day, each cut to its key points.

Specialty newsletters: every new paper in your field, as a list of titles linked to the source. Daily Selection: the five that matter, cut to their key points.

FreeNo spamOne-click unsubscribe

More in Surgical Endoscopy

The latest stitches

Surg Endosc27 Oct 2026

On-demand necrosectomy holds up in pancreatic necrosis

After EUS-guided drainage for infected necrotizing pancreatitis, immediate necrosectomy showed no clear clinical advantage over waiting to intervene as needed—and may expose more patients to the procedure.

All papers in Surgical Endoscopy →